 |
|
September 2004, Volume 10 No. 2
ARTICLE 8
Serum Vitamin E, C and A
Status in Pre-Eclampsia and Eclampsia Patients, and Their
Correlation with Blood
Pressure: a Study in Dhaka, Bangladesh
Sheikh Nazrul Islam1, Touhida Ahsan2, Shahla
Khatun2, Md Nazrul Islam Khan1 & Monira Ahsan3
1 Institute of Nutrition and Food Science, University
of Dhaka, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh
2 Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Bangabanddhu
Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh
3 Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of
Dhaka, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to determine serum concentrations of
vitamin E, C and A in pre-eclampsia and eclampsia patients, and to
analyse their relationship with blood pressure. It was a
cross-sectional case controlled study comprising forty-four pre-eclampsia,
fifty eclampsia, and thirty-five normo-tensive pregnant women of
singleton gestations in their third trimester from two hospitals in
Dhaka, Bangladesh. HPLC and spectrophotometric methods were employed
to determine the serum concentrations of vitamin E, A, and C. SPSS
software package was used to analyse the data. Serum vitamin C was
found to be significantly higher (F=6.266, p=0.003) in the pre-eclampsia
group than in the pregnant control and eclampsia groups, while serum
vitamin E and A in patients and control did not differ
significantly. Vitamin C levels in the pre-eclampsia group were
found to be influenced by their maternal age (F(2,41)=3.197,
p=0.05), and found to be positively related to the maternal age (r
=0.250 and p=0.106). In the pre-eclampsia group, vitamin E showed a
positive significant relationship with systolic pressure (beta
coefficient= 0.303, P=0.052, R2=0.101) and diastolic pressure (beta
co-efficient=0.459, P=0.002, R2=0.211). In the eclampsia group,
vitamin C showed a negative significant relationship with systolic
blood pressure (beta co-efficient=-0.502, P=0.000, R2=0.302) but in
the case of diastolic pressure, the relationship was reversed (beta
co-efficient=0.443, P=0.001, R2=0.237).
Full
Article >>
|
|
|
|
 |
|
March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16 |
|
|
|