Mal J Nutr 23(1): 9 - 16, 2017

Determinants of Zinc Status of 2-3-Year-Old Children in Laguna, Philippines
Rodesa T Naupal-Forcadilla1, Corazon VC Barba2, Maria Theresa M Talavera2 & Marison R Dy3


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Zinc deficiency has been considered a micronutrient problem of high magnitude in the Philippines. The effect of zinc deficiency on physical growth manifests during the first two years of life and is associated with high rates of infection and inadequate nutrition. The study aims to assess the zinc status of children and identify factors that affect zinc status.
Methods: A multi-stage stratified random sampling was used in a cross-sectional study of 2 -3-year-old children currently residing in the province of Laguna, Philippines. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire. A 24-hour food recall data sheet was used for evaluation of food intake. The physical dimensions of children were measured using salter weighing scale and height board. A static biochemical test of nutrients in the blood was carried out to assess the level of zinc and presence of infection in the body. The Early Childhood Care and Development program checklist, Metro Manila Developmental Screening Test and Child Development Index were adapted to determine the level of cognitive development of children.
Results: Correlation analysis revealed that anthropometric indices and food intake had a significant and positive linear association with zinc status (energy r=.014; P=.000; protein r=.027; P=.000; zinc r=.044; P=.000; iron r=.070; P=.000). The presence of infection was found to have a negative but significant relationship with zinc status. Zinc status was significantly associated with cognitive development.
Conclusion: The study showed that determinants of zinc status are nutrient intake (such as energy and zinc), infection, height-for-age index and cognitive development.

Keywords: Associated factors, cognitive development, height-for-age, infection, zinc status

Download full article

March 1995, Vol1 No.1
September 1995, Vol1 No.2
March 1996, Vol2 No.1
September 1996, Vol2 No.2
March 1997, Vol3 No.1
September 1997, Vol3 No.2
December 1998, Vol4 No.1&2
December 1999, Vol5 No.1&2
March 2000, Vol6 No.1
September 2000, Vol6 No.2
Mar/Sept 2001, Vol7 No.1&2
March 2002, Vol8, No.1
September 2002, Vol8, No.2
March 2003, Vol9 No.1
September 2003, Vol9 No.2
March 2004, Vol10 No.1
September 2004, Vol10 No. 2
2005, Vol 11 No.1
2005, Vo l11 No.2
2006, Vol 12 No.1
2006, Vol 12 No.2
2007, Vol 13 No.1
2007, Vol 13 No.2
March 2008, Vol 14 No.1
2008, Vol 14 No.2
2009, Vol 15 No.1
2009, Vol 15 No.2
2010, Vol 16(1)

2010, Vol 16(2)

2010, Vol 16(3)

2011, Vol 17(1)

2011, Vol 17(2)

2011, Vol 17(3)

2012, Vol 18(1)

2012, Vol 18(2)

2012, Vol 18(3)

2013, Vol 19(1)

2013, Vol 19(2)

2013, Vol 19(3)

2014, Vol 20(1)

2014, Vol 20(2)

2014, Vol 20(3)

2015, Vol 21(1)

2015, Vol 21(2)

2015, Vol 21(3)

2016, Vol 22(1)

2016, Vol 22(2)

2016, Vol 22 Supplement

2016, Vol 22(3)

2017, Vol 23(1)